Skip to Main Content

MedEd Symposium

MedEd Symposium 2026 Web banner

Register to Attend or Present at the 2026 MedEd Symposium

Calling all educators, clinicians, trainees and health professional students from USF Health and our HCA GME consortium!  

Join us at the 3rd Annual USF Health Medical Education Symposium.

Theme: "Bridging Theory to Practice: Insights from the Learning Environment"

Help shape the future of health professions education! This year’s theme spotlights the powerful link between educational theory and real-world practice—whether in classrooms, clinics, simulation labs, or community settings. 

We’re seeking compelling examples of innovative teaching, reflective practice, and systems-based solutions that close the gap between how people learn and how we deliver education.

Want to showcase your programmatic success, research project, creative work, or have an innovative idea needing resources and support? Consider presenting your education-related scholarly work at the MedEd Symposium!

Abstract proposals are invited in four distinct categories:

  • Innovations in Medical Education (poster)
  • Research in Medical Education (poster)
  • Creative Expression (varies)
  • Ace pitch! (oral)
 New this year: Accepting Presenters for Workshops!

Registration and Submission Deadlines

The symposium is on Friday February 27, 2026 from 9am-4pm at the Morsani College of Medicine in Channelside.

  • Registration
    •  Registration to attend the conference will be available in December.
  • Workshop Presenters
    • August 18, 2025: Call for Workshop Presentations opens
    • October 10, 2025: submission deadline 
    • Will be notified of acceptance in November
  • Abstracts
    • October 15, 2025: Call for Abstract Submissions opens
    • December 18, 2025: Abstract Submissions deadline
    • Will be notified of acceptance in January

NEW this year

Be a Workshop Presenter!

Deadline to submit: Friday Oct 10th 11:59pm EST. For those who submitted, you will be notified in November. 

We are seeking 90-minute interactive workshops that provide practical tools, foster active engagement, and reflect innovations or challenges grounded in the learning environment—whether in clinical settings, classrooms, simulation spaces, or communities. Proposals may address (but are not limited to):

  • Clinical teaching strategies
  • Assessment and feedback methods
  • Faculty or learner development
  • Interprofessional education
  • Simulation and experiential learning
  • Learning environment culture and climate
  • Equity and inclusion in teaching and learning
  • Technology-enhanced instruction

Workshops should be designed to engage participants actively and leave them with take-home strategies or frameworks they can apply in their own settings. 

Want to Submit an Abstract? - Submissions Accepted in 4 Categories

Innovations in Medical Education (IME) Abstracts 

Purpose: To promote dissemination and discussion of educational innovations.

Criteria: 2000 character (max) abstract, outlining:

  • Objective or purpose of innovation
  • Background or theoretical framework and importance to the field
  • Instructional methods and materials used
  • Educational outcomes to date
  • Innovation’s strengths and areas for improvement
  • Feasibility of maintaining program and transfer to other schools/programs
  • References (Not included in word count)

IME Abstract

Research in Medical Education (RIME) Abstracts 

Purpose: To promote dissemination and discussion of research and its application to medical education.

Criteria: 2000 character (max) research abstract outlining:

  • Introduction including background, purpose and significance of the study
  • Methods
  • Results to date
  • Conclusions
  • References (Not included in word count)

RIME Abstract Template

Creative Expression

Purpose: To disseminate creative ideas in medical education, including medical arts and humanities, narrative, visual, and other expressions to support medical education

  • Participants accepted to present in this category will have a platform to showcase their creative works in innovative ways

Criteria: 2000 character (max) abstract outlining:

  • Introduction including description of the origin of the idea, and objective of the creative purpose
  • Description of the creative work, may include a link to website or document with scaled product

Any other pertinent information to present the creative product

Creative Expression Abstract

Ace Pitch! Abstracts 

Purpose: To cultivate new ideas rooted in good educational practice, and support scholarly development

  • A "Shark Tank"-like presentation, participants accepted to present in this category compete with each other to qualify for up to $1500 in seed funding. 

Criteria: 2000 character (max) abstract outlining:

  • Introduction including description of the origin of the idea, and objective or purpose for innovation
  • Background or theoretical framework and importance to the field (i.e. statement of the problem)
  • Proposed Instructional methods and materials used
  • Intended educational outcomes
  • Description of budget and justification
  • References (Not included in word count)

Ace Pitch! Abstract

Abstracts can be submitted October 15, 2025 through December 18, 2025. Please complete the abstract and submit/upload to the submission form.  

Guidelines for Writing IME/RIME Abstracts

An abstract:

  • Is a condensed version of a full research/innovation description paper. 
  • Provides reviewers a brief synopsis of innovation/research purpose, design, findings to date and implications.                                                       
  • Focuses on primary issues of why the work was done, how it was/is carried out, what was found, and what the potential implications are.
  • Is written clearly with strict adherence to published specifications and format requirements.
  • Is proofread carefully.  

Let's take a closer look at each Abstract section and how the following questions should be answered.

    • Provide a context or explanation for doing the study/innovation. 
    • State the aim of the study/innovation.
    • Show relevance of the work to the field.  
    • Introduce the design/approach of the study/innovation. 
    • State the context in which it was done and who participated.
    • Describe how the study/innovation was executed (including data sources and analysis).
    • Include key data/outcomes that flow from previous sections and from which you will draw your conclusions.
    • Do not include interpretations. 
    • Report descriptive data (response rate, final pool of participants), inferential values with p values, functional significance (effect size), and/or emergent themes and sub‐themes, if applicable.
    • A table or figure may be included if permitted and it conveys the findings of the study/innovations more effectively than text alone.
    • Interpret results.
    • State the implications/importance of the results. 
    • Relate to the purpose of the study/innovation. 
    • Convey as much as possible about context and aims of your study. 
    • Alert readers to the overall “take‐home message.” 
    • Describe what was investigated/done rather than to state results or conclusions. 
    • Don’t use jargon, or unfamiliar acronyms 
    • Include key aspects of study/innovation design 
    • Use simple declarative sentences; active voice is preferable to passive voice.
    • Spell out all but the most commonplace abbreviations or acronyms the first time they appear.
    • Re‐read the instructions before printing the final onto the submission form, and to make sure they have been followed to the letter. 
    • Avoid grammatical mistakes, misspelled words, or typographical errors.
    • Read colleagues’ accepted abstracts and/or published abstracts from recent meetings (if they are available).
    • The list of authors should be restricted to those individuals who actually did the study— conceived it, designed it, gathered the data, crunched the numbers, and wrote the abstract. 
    • Author lists are rough rank orders of the relative contributions of the persons named, with the exception that the senior author (the mentor) is often listed last. 
    • The author listed first is the person who conceived the study and did most of the creative work on the project. With few exceptions, this should be the person who will present the abstract, if it is accepted.
  • Funds for students, postdocs, and techs are allowed, but faculty salaries are not. Supplies, core services, publication costs, equipment and meeting travel are all allowed. Gift cards are allowable if used/needed as an incentive for conducting human subject research (significant restrictions apply). Projects will be funded up to $1,500 for one year.

    Examples: The funds could be used for the following:

    1. Supplies
      1. Computer
      2. Office (Printing, Postage, etc.)
      3. Educational (Reference Books, Simulation Supplies, etc.)
    2. Publication Expenses
    3. Software (for individuals associated with USF)
      1. Subscriptions
      2. Licenses
    4. Travel (Fac, Staff, and Students)
      1. Conferences
      2. Registrations
      3. Membership Renewal
    5. Pay Distributions
      1. Student Workers, post docs, OPS employees
      2. Staff/Admin
    6. Internal USF expenses – Using a Chartfields
      1. Hall Rentals
      2. Ropes Course
      3. Hands on USF Interpreting Services
    7. Food for Events